ON THE THEORETICAL PROBLEMS OF PREDICTABILITY IN SERBIAN PALATALIZATION
Abstract
The paper presents the Serbian velar palatalization: /k/ → [tʃ], /ɡ/ → [ʒ], /x/ → [ʃ]. A detailed, comprehensive description of the phenomenon will not be provided, as it is not the main task and theme of the paper. The paper demonstrates that predictability does not strictly hold „in equal measure” in phonology, contrary to what traditional grammars suggest (e.g., Klajn 2005). Even theory-specifi approaches do not address it (e.g., Starčević 2005). This is one of the foundational assumptions of the theory of Government Phonology à la Kaye et al. (1985; 1990): phonological processes are organized according to universal principles and are not arbitrary (Non-Arbitrariness Principle). Universal rules can be overridden by parametric settings, which characterize the phonology of a specific language – in this, Government Phonology shares principles parallel to those of the Minimalist Program. The task of the paper is to show when predictability is not met, through the lens of Serbian phonology, based on the aspect that shows I-U asymmetry. The paper’s implicit goal is to highlight that the strict conditions imposed on phonological theories may not necessarily account for the variations shown on the surface, and things are much more complicated than what we might assume about Universal Grammar. The paper follows the theory of Government Phonology along with Element Theory (Backley 2011), which will be essential for explaining the phenomenon.
References
Bobaljik, Jonathan D. 2000. The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. Linguistics (10): 35–71.
Browne, Wayles. 2021. Adjacent vs. separated placement of preposition and noun as a factor in noun inflection: The cases of Bosnian-Croatian-Serbian pazuho ‘armpit’. Vilnius University Open Series. 67–77. Vilnius: Vilnius University Press. https:// doi.org/10.15388/SBOL.2021.3
Cyran, Eugeniusz. 2003. Complexity Scales and Licensing Strength in Phonology. Lubin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Gussmann, Edmund. 1977. Is the Second Velar Palatalisation a Synchronic Rule of Modern Polish? Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Jezykoznawczego 35. 27–41.
Jurgec, Peter. 2016. Velar palatalization in Slovenian: Local and long-distance interactions in a derived environment effect. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 1 (1): 24. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.129
Kalin, Laura. 2020. Morphology before phonology: Acase study of Turoyo (Neo-Aramaic). Morphology 30 (3): 135–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3
Kaye, Jonathan – Lowenstamm, Jean – Vergnaud, Jean-Rogern. 1985. Constituent Structure and Government in Phonology. Phonology (7): 305–328.
Kaye, Jonathan – Lowenstamm, Jean – Vergnaud, Jean-Rogern. 1985. The Internal Structure of Phonological Elements: A Theory of Charm and Government. Phonology Yearbook (2): 305–328.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical morphology and phonology. Linguistics in the Morning Calm ed. I. S. Yang. 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.
Klajn, Ivan. 2005. Gramatika srpskog jezika. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
Kochetov, Alexei. 2011. Palatalization. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology III., ed. Marc van Oostendorp. 1–25. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Polgárdi Krisztina – Rebrus Péter. 1998. There is no Labial Harmony in Hungarian: A Government Phonology Approach. In Casper de Groot – István Kenesei szerk. Approaches to Hungarian. Vol. 6. Papers from the Amsterdam Conference, 3–20. Szeged: JATEPress.
Pöchtrager, Markus A. 2006. The Structure of Length. Vienna: University of Vienna dissertation.
Pöchtrager, Markus A. 2010. The Structure of A. Paper presented at the 33rd GLOW Colloquium, 13–16 April 2010. Wrocław, Poland.
Pöchtrager, Markus A. 2013. On A. Paper presented at the A Workshop on Melodic Representation, 12 March 2013. UCL, London.
Pöchtrager, Markus A. 2019. Zárlatok és kezdetek. Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok 31. 205–232. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Pöchtrager, Markus A. 2021. Towards a non-arbitrary account of affricates and affrication. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6 (1): 61. 1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ gjgl.1116
Radišić, Milica. 2007. The double nature of the velar /g/ in Serbian. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 30. 91–103.
Radišić, Milica. 2009. Velar /g/ in Serbian – Stop of fricative: A Contrastive Account. PhD dissertation. University of Toronto.
Rebrus, Péter – Szigetvári, Péter – Törkenczy, Miklós. 2016. A non-cumulative pattern in vowel harmony: a frequencybased account. Proceedings of the Annual Meetings on Phonology, 3.
Rebrus, Péter – Szigetvári, Péter – Törkenczy, Miklós. 2023. How Morphological is Hungarian Vowel Harmony? Proceedings of the Annual Meetings on Phonology, 10.
Rubach, Jerzy. 1984. Cyclic and lexical phonology: The structure of Polish. Berlin – New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Simonović, Marko. 2022. Animacy influences segmental phonology: The velar-sibilant alternation in BCMS. FDSL-15: Formal Description of Slavic Languages 15. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Siptár, Péter. 1994. Palatalization rules in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 42 (1–2): 5–32. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Starčević Attila. 2005. Palatalizáció a horvátban és a szerbben: létezik egyáltalán? LingDok 4 (4): 150–173.
Sussex, Roland – Cubberley, Paul. 2006. The Slavic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Živanović, Sašo – Pöchtrager, Markus A. 2010. GP 2, and Putonghua too. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 54 (4): 357–380.